If you’ve been hiding under a rock, newsflash: March is Women’s History Month and today is International Women’s Day. I happen to know some pretty badass women and I hope you do, too. What better time to blog about some children’s and YA titles that highlight amazing women! Check out one or a few of them at your school or public library. I hope you enjoy curling up with them to read with the young rad girls in your life.
Ada Twist, Scientist by Andrea Beaty. illus. by David Roberts. Abrams. 32 pp.
Curious about what surrounds her, young Ada is the scientist of her class. A classmate to Rosie Revere and Iggy Peck, Ada does research to find the answers to her questions. Perfect addition to a STEM or makerspace collection. (Inspired by Ada Lovelace and Marie Curie.)
Rosie Revere, Engineer by Beaty, Andrea. illus. by David Roberts. Abrams. 32 pp.
Rosie is an innovator and can build just about anything. When one of her contraptions turns out different than expected, she learns failure isn’t such bad thing. Spark a child’s imagination by adding this one to the collection. (Inspired by the life of Rosie the Riveter.)
It’s connection day again, post DIR; seems like I always choose text-to-world. I’m reading The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas—a highly acclaimed “Black Lives Matter” novel. It recently received its eighth star review in the literary world.
At today’s point in the novel, Starr (the protagonist) is wondering why her best friend at school seems so distant now and thinks back to when Hailey started to drift away.
“Plus she unfollowed my Tumblr.
She has no clue that I know. I once posted a picture of Emmett Till, a fourteen-year-old black boy who was murdered for whistling at a white woman in 1955…Hailey texted me immediately after, freaking out.”
The irony in Thomas’ inclusion of this event is that the woman who accused Emmett Till of whistling at her recently acknowledged she lied about the incident, ALL THESE YEARS LATER. I wonder, if this information had been revealed before or during Thomas’ writing process, would she have still used this particular example to drive the point that Hailey was so disturbed and angered by Starr’s choice to use Till’s photo on her blog? What would have been the alternate image?
I can’t help but also relate this to the news that departments at my alma mater, including the one from which I received my information sciences degree, recently pulled their sponsorship of a lecture by an assistant professor at Morgan State University solely based on the title—”How Killing Black Children is an American Tradition.”
What message are we sending when we try to censor a journalism professor based on title alone because (the) words have too much “power?” What message are we sending when we criticize our “friend” (as Hailey does in THUG) for exposing history because it looks “awful?”